Donella
Meadows book “Thinking in Systems” explores complex relationship and
discusses them in an easy to understand language. She examines why oil
fields are not completely drained before companies move on to the next
one (dynamics of depletion), what incentives make illegal drugs
obtainable even with strict government policies that discourage drug-use
(balancing loops), and why pest attacks on fir forests reak widespread
havoc (non-linear feedback loops).
This
weekend I learned that Ms. Meadows is a gifted storyteller and that
systems thinking is not straightforward. I’ll be honest, my first foray
into actually diagramming systems was tough. It’s one thing to read a
story and see a systems diagram and a whole nother thing to make one.
What is a stock and flow? Where do the little faucets go? How are bad
loans from Washington Mutal like a bathtub?
I
think one of the main reasons it was hard to get a handle on systems
diagramming is that is part of a larger process. In fact it is step 5 of
a 6 step process.
Going over Marsha’s slides again I tried to understand what is going on. This is what I figured out thus far:
Systems Thinking focuses heavily on exploring and framing the problem.
Step
1 - Tell a story and frame the issue. What’s happening? What’s
observable? Who’s involved? Who’s impacted? How can we frame the issue
without couching it in a biased solution?
Step
2 - Sketch the trends. How is behavior changing over time? Do the
trends repeat every day, week, century? Do we need a short amount of
time to see the trends, or a long amount of time?
Step
3 - Name the variables. What is measurable and affecting or affected by
the changing behavior(s) over time? Cast the net wide!
Step
4 - Set boundaries to the problem and identify stakeholders. What are
crucial elements in telling the story for the point of view and context
already selected? Like a photograph, stories can always be zoomed in and
zoomed out. The important thing is to capture the essence of the issue
and ensure everyone (stakeholders) who will impact potential changes in
the system are identified and brought into the process.
Step
5 - Make the system visible! Finally, after all that research and work
distilling down issues and variables it is time to draw the boxes and
arrows to make stock and flow diagrams or causal loop diagrams!
Step
6 - Determine the leverage points. Once the system is visible it is
possible to see where and how solutions can create change.
Seeing
it all laid out like that helps me understand what systems diagramming
is about and makes me realize that during the intensive I focused much
of my attention on step 5. No wonder I was frustrated. I jumped into the
middle of a process without setting the groundwork.
In
fact, it seems that systems thinking is a step-by-step process to
thinking about a problem. As Albert Einstein once said, “If I had an
hour to solve a problem and my life depended on the solution, I would
spend the first fifty-five minutes determining the proper question to
ask, for once I know the proper question, I could solve the problem in
less than five minutes.” If Mr. Einstein is right, then spending 5 out
of the 6 steps understanding the problem is a smart approach.
This all brings me back to the mistake I made when I first saw the phrase “causal loop diagram”. I read that to be casual, not causal.
After spending a weekend wrestling with these diagrams I realize that
these are not “casual” diagrams that you can just sit down and quickly sketch out. You can’t start one whenever you like. They require
commitment and are the fruitiation of many prior steps of work. There is
nothing relaxed, unconcerned, or casual about them.
Listening
to the news about government defaults, budget negotiations, and health
care issues I see systems at play all around me. So many of the commentators want to make the connections within the system “casual”. We tend to want quick
fixes based off quickly gathered, casual information, “Let’s put a quick
band-aid on this issue and get back to it later.” Pretty soon we have
impeding doom all around us with systems that have never been truly
changed. As my teammate Justice Reign
reminds us, “Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets.” So let’s spend time understanding the systems, change
them and get the results that we truly desire.
I can’t wait to dive in with my team and see what interesting insights we can glean from a systems thinking process and what system changes we take on!
I loved reading your post! Such a great reminder about the importance of figuring out what the real questions are before diving into the work.
ReplyDeleteSo good! I'm a solutions man myself. Tell me what's going on, and lickity split, I have a solution.. BUT the problem is an iceberg and not based solely on this one event or situation. I've become a better listener by understanding there is more than just the snapshot in time I'm looking at now.
ReplyDeleteMaybe that's what being an empathetic listener is all about?
The reckoning was a powerful experience for me as far as systems go. I found it empowering to map the systems from all different points and then see the leverage points reveal themselves. I DO WISH that we had some articles from additional publications other than the New York Times. I know there are a lot of reputable publications out there that may have offered a different perspective and widened our window for the mapping exercise.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your words on systems Caitlin... we have a lot more to learn!!